Skip to main content

radicals

Revealing the cross-talk between nitric oxide metabolites

Submitted by redoxoma on
Artistic EPR spectra

Redoxoma Highlights, by Daniela Truzzi
Corresponding author e-mail: dtruz@hotmail.comzi@iq.usp.br

Nitric oxide (NO) is an endogenously produced diatomic radical that regulates fundamental biological functions. Although NO is a free radical, its reactivity in biological media is selective toward other radicals and transition metal centers. NO metabolites include S-nitroso thiols (RSNOs), nitrite, peroxynitrite, nitrosylated heme proteins, and dinitrosyl-iron complexes (DNICs). Among these metabolites, RSNOs have gained considerable attention due to their possible involvement in NO signaling. Biological formation of RSNO can occur by reaction of thiols with N2O3, peroxynitrite, other S-nitroso thiols (transnitrosation reactions), nitrosylated heme proteins and by a direct reaction between thiyl radicals (RS) and NO. Since most of these reactions are either slow or have low specificity for a signaling process, it has been proposed that S-nitrosation involves transfer of NO from DNICs to biothiols. DNICs are important NO-metabolites, which are able to trigger vasodilation, to inhibit platelet aggregation and skin wound healing. Nevertheless, little is known about the dynamics of DNICs generation under physiological conditions. By analyzing DNIC assemble from the reaction between NO, Fe(II) and low molecular weight biothiols (cysteine and glutathione) in aqueous media, pH 7.4, we detected mono-nitrosyl iron complex intermediate(s) and thiyl radicals (RS) as co-products. By demonstrating that formation of DNICs yields RS in a NO rich environment, these results provide a novel route for S-nitroso thiol formation in biological media. Additionally, this study explains previous reports showing that DNICs and RSNOs are simultaneously formed in macrophages exposed to NO. If such mechanism favors certain biothiols in forming RS and thus provides specificity to RSNO formation, remains an open question. Further studies of DNICs assembly with different biothiols may contribute to answer it.

Importantly, different biothiols may react through distinct mechanism with DNICs, opening the question if all biothiols would similarly have RS as an intermediate. This is of high relevance when considering signaling pathways and specificity.

This study involved collaboration between researchers from CEPID Redoxoma and from University of California, Santa Barbara.


Related article:

  1. D. R. Truzzi, O. Augusto, P. C. Ford. Thiyl radicals are co-products of dinitrosyl iron complex (DNIC) formation Chemical Communications, 55(62): 9156–9, 2019. | doi: 10.1039/c9cc04454j

Daniela Truzzi, from Department of Biochemistry,
Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil


Add new comment

A radical connection: Peroxynitrite and carbon dioxide

Submitted by redoxoma on
A radical connection

Redoxoma Highlights by by Ohara Augusto
Corresponding author e-mail: oag-I-am-here-usto@hotmail.com@iq.usp.br

In 2002, my laboratory published a review with the title “Nitrogen dioxide and carbonate radical anion: Two emerging radicals in Biology” [1] to draw attention to these radicals, which had received limited (nitrogen dioxide) or practically no (carbonate radical) attention in the biological literature by then. However, the times were changing due to the work of several researchers around the world. These investigators established that carbon dioxide (produced continuously by cell metabolism) and peroxynitrite (the strong oxidant produced by the extremely rapid reaction between superoxide radical and nitric oxide) react with a considerable second-order rate constant to produce an unstable adduct, nitrosoperoxocarbonate, which undergoes O–O bond homolysis, producing solvent-caged nitrogen dioxide and carbonate radical pairs. Part of these radicals escapes the cage as nitrogen dioxide and carbonate radicals (determined as 0.33 each/peroxynitrite) while the remaining caged radicals decayed to nitrate and carbon dioxide (determined as 0.67 each/peroxynitrite) (Figure 1). Since part of the carbon dioxide is recycled, it can be viewed as a catalyst of peroxynitrite decomposition to radicals. Therefore, nitrogen dioxide and carbonate radicals were likely to play important roles in the biological actions of peroxynitrite. This radical mechanism has passed the test of the years and has attained widespread acceptance, despite occasional attacks by a few researchers, particularly by W H Koppenol and co-workers. The last attack was published in 2018 [2], predicting a yield of nitrogen dioxide/carbonate radical of less than 0.01 (per peroxynitrite) under physiological conditions and, in contrast to the widely accepted view, suggesting that radical generation is inconsequential to peroxynitrite-induced oxidative damage. To avoid the eventual confusion provoked by such claims, a number of researchers actively involved in establishing the radical connection between peroxynitrite and carbon dioxide reviewed the experimental and theoretical evidence for the radical mechanism and critically analyzed the experiments that have led to erroneous conclusions [3]. The authors conclusively show that all confirmed research by several independent groups on the structural and dynamic properties of peroxynitrite support the radical mechanism. Therefore, the radical mechanism, which invokes the intermediacy of nitrogen dioxide and carbonate radical in all carbon dioxide-catalyzed oxidations/nitrations/nitrosations by peroxynitrite, can be confidently used to interpret peroxynitrite biochemistry.

Schematic reaction of peroxynitrite and carbon dioxide

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the reaction between peroxynitrite and carbon dioxide to produce nitrogen dioxide and carbonate radicals, which are quite reactive towards biomolecules (BM).


References

  1. O. Augusto, M. G. Bonini, A. M. Amanso, E. Linares, C. C. Santos, S. L. De Menezes. Nitrogen dioxide and carbonate radical anion: two emerging radicals in biology Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 32(9): 841–59, 2002. | doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00786-4
  2. S. Serrano-Luginbuehl, R. Kissner, W. H. Koppenol. Reaction of CO2 with ONOO: One Molecule of CO2 Is Not Enough Chemical Research in Toxicology, 31(8): 721–30, 2018. | doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00068
  3. O. Augusto, S. Goldstein, J. K. Hurst, J. Lind, S. V. Lymar, G. Merenyi, R. Radi. Carbon dioxide-catalyzed peroxynitrite reactivity – The resilience of the radical mechanism after two decades of research Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 135: 210–5, 2019. | doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.02.026

Ohara Augusto, (oag-I-am-here-usto@hotmail.com@iq.usp.br) Director of CEPID Redoxoma, PhD Professor at Department of Biochemistry,
Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil


Add new comment